Last updated · refreshes automatically as new data lands.
Looking for an alternative to web-vitals? Site Stats Database tracks 17 other monitoring & error tracking tools; the top ones are below, ranked by adoption, with authority and traffic for each and the leading sites that use them. web-vitals itself is used by 1,615 websites. Back to web-vitals.
| Monitoring | Websites | Share | Median DR | Median traffic | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| web-vitals (this page) |
| 1,615 |
| 4.5% |
| 29 |
| 4,850 |
| - |
| New Relic | 9,950 | 27.9% | 35 | 10,923 | web-vitals vs New Relic |
| Sentry | 9,659 | 27.1% | 13 | 2,742 | web-vitals vs Sentry |
| Microsoft Application Insights | 4,241 | 11.9% | 49 | 29,291 | web-vitals vs Microsoft Application Insights |
| Boomerang | 3,066 | 8.6% | 59 | 17,251 | web-vitals vs Boomerang |
| Datadog RUM | 3,018 | 8.5% | 19 | 2,954 | web-vitals vs Datadog RUM |
| Akamai mPulse | 2,496 | 7.0% | 63 | 19,434 | web-vitals vs Akamai mPulse |
| Adobe Helix RUM | 2,063 | 5.8% | 62 | 22,919 | web-vitals vs Adobe Helix RUM |
| Dynatrace RUM | 1,173 | 3.3% | 66 | 15,772 | web-vitals vs Dynatrace RUM |
| Pingdom RUM | 717 | 2.0% | 45 | 10,519 | web-vitals vs Pingdom RUM |
| Elastic APM | 345 | 1.0% | 29 | 6,094 | web-vitals vs Elastic APM |
| Bugsnag | 254 | 0.7% | 43 | 6,360 | web-vitals vs Bugsnag |
| AppDynamics | 244 | 0.7% | 66 | 9,568 | web-vitals vs AppDynamics |
| SpeedCurve | 230 | 0.6% | 70 | 6,577 | web-vitals vs SpeedCurve |
| Honeybadger | 199 | 0.6% | 6 | 2,450 | web-vitals vs Honeybadger |
| Rollbar | 165 | 0.5% | 54 | 13,083 | web-vitals vs Rollbar |
| Site24x7 | 110 | 0.3% | 54 | 7,014 | web-vitals vs Site24x7 |
| Raygun | 100 | 0.3% | 56 | 4,383 | web-vitals vs Raygun |
9,950
Websites
27.9%
Share of Monitoring
35
Median DR
10,923
Median traffic
Top sites using New Relic
Sentry is an error-tracking and performance-monitoring platform for applications.
9,659
Websites
27.1%
Share of Monitoring
13
Median DR
2,742
Median traffic
Top sites using Sentry
4,241
Websites
11.9%
Share of Monitoring
49
Median DR
29,291
Median traffic
Top sites using Microsoft Application Insights
3,066
Websites
8.6%
Share of Monitoring
59
Median DR
17,251
Median traffic
Top sites using Boomerang
3,018
Websites
8.5%
Share of Monitoring
19
Median DR
2,954
Median traffic
Top sites using Datadog RUM
2,496
Websites
7.0%
Share of Monitoring
63
Median DR
19,434
Median traffic
Top sites using Akamai mPulse
2,063
Websites
5.8%
Share of Monitoring
62
Median DR
22,919
Median traffic
Top sites using Adobe Helix RUM
1,173
Websites
3.3%
Share of Monitoring
66
Median DR
15,772
Median traffic
Top sites using Dynatrace RUM
717
Websites
2.0%
Share of Monitoring
45
Median DR
10,519
Median traffic
Top sites using Pingdom RUM
345
Websites
1.0%
Share of Monitoring
29
Median DR
6,094
Median traffic
Top sites using Elastic APM
By number of websites, the most widely used alternatives to web-vitals are New Relic, Sentry, Microsoft Application Insights, Boomerang, Datadog RUM. The right one depends on your needs; compare them on adoption, authority, and audience above.
Site Stats Database tracks 17 other monitoring & error tracking tools used by 100 or more websites, plus a long tail of rarer ones. web-vitals itself is used by 1,615 websites.
New Relic leads this category with 9,950 websites in our catalog.
Adoption is counted from Site Stats Database's own crawl; authority (Ahrefs Domain Rating) and traffic come from Ahrefs and DataForSEO. Everything reflects the sites we track and refreshes at least monthly.
Citation
Site Stats Database. "web-vitals Alternatives & Competitors." Site Stats Database, July 1, 2026. https://sitestatsdb.com/technologies/monitoring/web-vitals/alternatives
Site Stats Database tracks every monitoring / error-tracking tool with full monthly traffic history, authority, keywords, referring domains, and the complete detected tech stack. Filter, compare, and export the data.
See plans & pricing