Last updated · refreshes automatically as new data lands.
Looking for an alternative to SpeedCurve? Site Stats Database tracks 17 other monitoring & error tracking tools; the top ones are below, ranked by adoption, with authority and traffic for each and the leading sites that use them. SpeedCurve itself is used by 230 websites. Back to SpeedCurve.
| Monitoring | Websites | Share | Median DR | Median traffic | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SpeedCurve (this page) |
| 230 |
| 0.6% |
| 70 |
| 6,577 |
| - |
| New Relic | 9,950 | 27.9% | 35 | 10,923 | SpeedCurve vs New Relic |
| Sentry | 9,659 | 27.1% | 13 | 2,742 | SpeedCurve vs Sentry |
| Microsoft Application Insights | 4,241 | 11.9% | 49 | 29,291 | SpeedCurve vs Microsoft Application Insights |
| Boomerang | 3,066 | 8.6% | 59 | 17,251 | SpeedCurve vs Boomerang |
| Datadog RUM | 3,018 | 8.5% | 19 | 2,954 | SpeedCurve vs Datadog RUM |
| Akamai mPulse | 2,496 | 7.0% | 63 | 19,434 | SpeedCurve vs Akamai mPulse |
| Adobe Helix RUM | 2,063 | 5.8% | 62 | 22,919 | SpeedCurve vs Adobe Helix RUM |
| web-vitals | 1,615 | 4.5% | 29 | 4,850 | SpeedCurve vs web-vitals |
| Dynatrace RUM | 1,173 | 3.3% | 66 | 15,772 | SpeedCurve vs Dynatrace RUM |
| Pingdom RUM | 717 | 2.0% | 45 | 10,519 | SpeedCurve vs Pingdom RUM |
| Elastic APM | 345 | 1.0% | 29 | 6,094 | SpeedCurve vs Elastic APM |
| Bugsnag | 254 | 0.7% | 43 | 6,360 | SpeedCurve vs Bugsnag |
| AppDynamics | 244 | 0.7% | 66 | 9,568 | SpeedCurve vs AppDynamics |
| Honeybadger | 199 | 0.6% | 6 | 2,450 | SpeedCurve vs Honeybadger |
| Rollbar | 165 | 0.5% | 54 | 13,083 | SpeedCurve vs Rollbar |
| Site24x7 | 110 | 0.3% | 54 | 7,014 | SpeedCurve vs Site24x7 |
| Raygun | 100 | 0.3% | 56 | 4,383 | SpeedCurve vs Raygun |
9,950
Websites
27.9%
Share of Monitoring
35
Median DR
10,923
Median traffic
Top sites using New Relic
Sentry is an error-tracking and performance-monitoring platform for applications.
9,659
Websites
27.1%
Share of Monitoring
13
Median DR
2,742
Median traffic
Top sites using Sentry
4,241
Websites
11.9%
Share of Monitoring
49
Median DR
29,291
Median traffic
Top sites using Microsoft Application Insights
3,066
Websites
8.6%
Share of Monitoring
59
Median DR
17,251
Median traffic
Top sites using Boomerang
3,018
Websites
8.5%
Share of Monitoring
19
Median DR
2,954
Median traffic
Top sites using Datadog RUM
2,496
Websites
7.0%
Share of Monitoring
63
Median DR
19,434
Median traffic
Top sites using Akamai mPulse
2,063
Websites
5.8%
Share of Monitoring
62
Median DR
22,919
Median traffic
Top sites using Adobe Helix RUM
1,615
Websites
4.5%
Share of Monitoring
29
Median DR
4,850
Median traffic
Top sites using web-vitals
1,173
Websites
3.3%
Share of Monitoring
66
Median DR
15,772
Median traffic
Top sites using Dynatrace RUM
717
Websites
2.0%
Share of Monitoring
45
Median DR
10,519
Median traffic
Top sites using Pingdom RUM
By number of websites, the most widely used alternatives to SpeedCurve are New Relic, Sentry, Microsoft Application Insights, Boomerang, Datadog RUM. The right one depends on your needs; compare them on adoption, authority, and audience above.
Site Stats Database tracks 17 other monitoring & error tracking tools used by 100 or more websites, plus a long tail of rarer ones. SpeedCurve itself is used by 230 websites.
New Relic leads this category with 9,950 websites in our catalog.
Adoption is counted from Site Stats Database's own crawl; authority (Ahrefs Domain Rating) and traffic come from Ahrefs and DataForSEO. Everything reflects the sites we track and refreshes at least monthly.
Citation
Site Stats Database. "SpeedCurve Alternatives & Competitors." Site Stats Database, July 1, 2026. https://sitestatsdb.com/technologies/monitoring/speedcurve/alternatives
Site Stats Database tracks every monitoring / error-tracking tool with full monthly traffic history, authority, keywords, referring domains, and the complete detected tech stack. Filter, compare, and export the data.
See plans & pricing